However, as this is the second time this has happened in a few days, I'm also inclined to be less willing to bend the rules in future. "None of the nominators may nominate or co-nominate any article for two weeks unless given leave to do so by a coordinator if such an article is nominated without asking for leave, a coordinator will decide whether to remove it." My inclination is to remove this, but I don't recall you doing this before so would be prepared to grant an exemption this once. I wasn't too sure about the image of the PlayStation Vita-did you mean verifying the game's influence over the console or the fact that it was the first model in the picture? JAG UAR 21:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Ĭoordinator comment: Please see the FAC instructions about when a nomination is archived. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:16, 29 March 2017 (UTC) Thanks for the review, Jo-Jo Eumerus! I think I should have cleared everything up, although I'm not that good with images. Or did you mean verifying that the console pictured is the first model? Verifying the fact that the game influenced the design of the console itself can be found in this source.File:PlayStation-Vita-1101-FL.jpg: Not seeing any issues, other than having difficulty of verifying the caption from the adjacent section.I've rephrased the rationale somewhat to make it clear that the image illustrates the gameplay of the game itself JAG UAR 21:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC).The current rationale would be appropriate if the file was used in the infobox header. File:Wipeout 2048 gameplay.jpg: This file is being used to illustrate the game play not the game which is different.I've added the proper video game rationale JAG UAR 21:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC) And the rationale for the other page the file isn't used on removed. File:Wipeout 2048 Boxart.jpg: The non-free use rationale is fairly basic I think some more stuff can be added.All of the instalments are currently GAs, but if all goes well this should be the first of five-can't promise anything! JAG UAR 12:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC) Comments on images:
WIPEOUT 2048 VITA SERIES
I'd like to make the Wipeout series a Featured Topic. Sources on development weren't plentiful, but I'm confident I squeezed enough out of the reliable sources. Another fun fact is that the game acted as a testbed for the console and had an influence in its design. I also think its reception is important because this game was a PlayStation Vita launch title and "tested the waters" of the console so to speak.
I think I overdone the reception section slightly but it has since been condensed and restructured to read as cohesive prose. Since I got stalled on my previous nomination I have nominated this article in the mean time since I took steps to ensure it was FA-ready, or I hope so anyway! I believe that this article meets the well-written, well-researched and comprehensiveness aspects of the FA criteria. The article was promoted by Ian Rose via FACBot ( talk) 09:32. No further edits should be made to this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination.